Digital Revolution Awards
We were delighted to attend the Digital Revolution Awards, celebrating the organisations and individuals driving meaningful change through technology across the UK. It was a fantastic evening recognising real innovation and impact, and a great reminder of the quality of work happening across our industry. Congratulations to all of the nominees and winners on the night.
The sun came out just in time for our annual Summer Social at Bondi Green. Hosted with Seer 365 and sponsored by our friends at TrueCommerce, iDynamics Business Solutions, Yavrio - Open Banking, Vertex Inc., Xe.com, Formpipe, Revolent Group, and Binary Stream Software - Microsoft ERP Solutions, the aim was, as always, to keep things simple - no slides. no presentations or pitches - just great conversation and a few cocktails, all enhanced by the gorgeous backdrop of the canal, thanks to Bondi Green's superb location.
These kinds of nights are a reminder that real community matters. Thanks to everyone who joined us - if you'd like to join us next year, please just let us know at info@oaka.studio.
IAMCP Events:
European Power Platform Conference: June 29 – July 2
There’s a Microsoft partner conversation we have far too often.
A partner works hard for a Solutions Partner designation. Customers get associated, certifications get chased, the Partner Capability Score finally creeps over the line and everyone breathes out.
Then the designation gets left alone.
A few months later someone opens Partner Center and finds the score has slipped, a certification has lapsed, customers have gone missing or the renewal window is approaching with the business sitting on 41 points. Panic follows, as it tends to.
The issue is rarely that the partner doesn’t understand Microsoft’s requirements. It’s that designation management has been treated as a project with a finish line rather than an ongoing part of running a Microsoft practice. This year, that difference matters more than it used to.
Gold and Silver are gone. Really.
We should probably get this out of the way, because years after they were retired we still see Gold and Silver competencies on partner websites, email signatures and marketing materials.
They can’t be renewed and they’re not part of the current partner model. If they’re still on your website because nobody’s got round to changing them, now’s a good moment.
Solutions Partner designations are the currency now, alongside specialisations and the newer layers Microsoft keeps adding around them. The bigger change, though, isn’t what the badges are called. The relationship itself is getting more demanding.
We’re seeing signs that Microsoft increasingly wants evidence that partners are continually delivering the things it cares about, rather than passing an assessment and vanishing for a year. Some programmes already look at measures like monthly active usage on a regular basis. To be clear, that’s our reading of the direction of travel rather than a confirmed programme change, but it’s a fairly strong signal.
A designation is becoming less like a certificate on the wall and more like something you have to keep healthy. Less convenient, admittedly.
Getting to 70 points is only half the job
The Partner Capability Score is simple enough in principle. You need 70 points to attain a Solutions Partner designation and 70 to renew it. You also need points in each of the three measurement categories, so a magnificent overall score with one required area at zero won’t get you there.
We still meet partners with plenty of points who assume they’re fine, then discover they’ve got nothing against net new customers or another required measure. The dashboard isn’t being difficult for fun, although Partner Center does occasionally give that impression.
Customer association matters too, and it’s unnecessarily easy to get wrong. Different designations use different association mechanisms, and even within Business Applications different CPOR association types can feed different metrics. Pick the wrong one and activity you expected to count towards net new customers may count towards usage instead.
The work happened and the customer is real. Microsoft just has no reason to credit you unless the association tells its systems the right story. Not a fun thing to learn after the fact.
Work backwards from the benefit you actually want
Another common mistake is deciding a designation looks impressive and then organising the business around getting it.
Start with what you’re trying to unlock. That might be funding, a particular specialisation, internal use rights, Azure credits, Marketplace benefits, co-sell opportunities or access to another Microsoft programme. Then work backwards.
Microsoft’s incentives guidance changes regularly, so look at which incentives map to services you already sell and customers you already have. Check eligibility before spending months chasing the designation or specialisation that unlocks them. There’s very little satisfaction in reaching the end and finding out the customers you had in mind aren’t eligible.
None of this means Microsoft should dictate your business strategy. Quite the opposite. We sometimes see partners inventing propositions purely because they fit the current incentive structure. There can be good reasons to build a new offer, but contorting the company to collect an incentive is usually a poor trade, especially when Microsoft changes its programmes rather more often than most partners change their businesses.
Your designation plan should support the business you’re building. It shouldn’t become the business.
The obvious designation isn’t always the best route
Partners tend to head straight for the designation that looks most like what they do. Reasonable, but not always the smartest path.
If the real goal is a particular specialisation, there may be more than one way in. Copilot specialisation came up in our Partner Insights session as a good example. The prerequisite can be met through Modern Work or Business Applications, so a partner struggling with the Business Applications designation might find a more practical route through Modern Work using its existing customer base.
Solutions Partner Insights in Partner Center can also show fit-gap information against designations you hadn’t been considering. We’ve seen partners much closer to an apparently unrelated designation than they realised. Worth a look before you commit everyone to another certification sprint.
Someone needs to own this properly
This is the least sophisticated advice in the article and the one partners ignore most consistently.
Give somebody ownership. Not nominal ownership, and not “Sarah looks after Partner Center when she has time”. Actual ownership.
Maintaining Microsoft capability needs allocated time, regular reporting and people who know which parts of the process are theirs. The person handling customer associations might not be the one planning certifications, and that’s fine. What matters is that those responsibilities live somewhere other than the edge of someone’s desk.
Edge-of-desk work behaves exactly as you’d expect. A customer issue comes up, a deal needs closing, someone goes on holiday, a project overruns and Partner Center can wait. Then renewal arrives and it turns out Partner Center couldn’t wait after all.
We’ve seen this often enough that regular designation governance is now part of how we work with partners. Monthly is sensible. Quarterly is a lot better than nothing. Track the score, certifications, associations and anything nearing expiry, and know which way the numbers are moving before the renewal window opens.
Don’t dump all your customer associations in at once
Another trap appears when a partner first gets serious about its designation. They find a backlog of customers that should have been associated, which is great, and then want to associate all of them immediately, which is less great.
Associations affect future performance and renewal. Land everything in one concentrated period and you can set up a very unpleasant comparison for yourself later. We usually recommend keeping a simple record of customers, approximate consumption and when each should be associated, then managing the flow deliberately rather than loading the lot into Partner Center in one heroic afternoon.
The same applies after a particularly strong period. Some measures require year-on-year growth, so today’s spectacular number can become next year’s awkward baseline.
This isn’t about gaming the rules. It’s about understanding how the measurement works before you feed data into it.
Keep your own records, because Partner Center occasionally disagrees with itself
Some partners assume that if Partner Center showed 74 points last month, it’ll remember that faithfully forever. We admire the optimism.
Keep evidence. Take regular screenshots of your attainment and store them somewhere central, along with records of customer associations and the people and certifications attached to the account. Microsoft’s data refreshes periodically and anomalies happen. When they do, a support ticket is far easier to resolve if you can show what the score said, rather than explaining that someone definitely remembers seeing it.
It feels old-fashioned because it is. Do it anyway.
Watch the SMB and enterprise tracks
This one has caught out several partners. A business can be progressing nicely against SMB requirements, then a change in its customer base moves it onto the enterprise track, where attainment requirements can be very different.
The result can be brutal. Partners sitting comfortably at 70, 80 or 90 points can drop sharply after switching tracks. Smaller and growing practices should pay particular attention, because enterprise requirements can increase the number of certified people you need, and renewal is the worst possible time to find that out.
Check which track you’re being measured against and what would cause it to change. Then add it to the governance meeting. Yes, another thing for the governance meeting.
Frontier isn’t for everybody
Microsoft’s Frontier Partner badge is deliberately demanding. The requirements span multiple Solutions Partner designations and specialisations across areas including AI, Copilot, DevOps and security, and at launch only a small number of firms globally could meet them.
For broad partners with real capability across Microsoft’s cloud, data, AI, business applications, modern work and security portfolio, it’s worth understanding. For a highly specialised partner, it may simply not be a sensible target, and there’s no shame in that. Microsoft builds programmes for different kinds of partners and you don’t have to collect them all.
What’s interesting about Frontier is what it says about Microsoft’s direction. Technical capability still matters, but Microsoft increasingly seems to be recognising partners that can show breadth and play deeply across its AI-led ecosystem. At the time of our session, Marketplace wasn’t yet showing the Frontier badge on partner profiles, though our understanding was that Frontier partners would get search prioritisation.
As with everything else here, pursue it because it supports where your business is going, not because a new badge exists.
Benefits only help if someone remembers to use them
There’s a slightly painful final stage to all this. A partner does the work, earns the designation and unlocks the benefits. Then carries on paying for things Microsoft now provides.
We’ve seen partners keep spending thousands of pounds on internal licensing because nobody told operations that new internal use rights were available. The same pattern turns up elsewhere. Commercial teams don’t know which funding paths have opened. Salespeople don’t know when to bring funding into customer conversations. Marketing hasn’t prepared to use the new co-branded assets. Nobody’s worked out who actually submits a claim.
That’s why attainment should trigger operational changes across the company. Sales, marketing, operations and whoever manages the Microsoft relationship should all know what’s now available and what they’re expected to do with it. Otherwise you’ve spent months earning a very complicated logo.
Partnership management is becoming an operating discipline
There was a time when plenty of partners could treat Microsoft partnership activity as something next to the actual business. Someone looked after the relationship, someone kept an eye on competencies, certifications got sorted when needed and everyone else got on with selling and delivering.
That separation is getting harder to keep up. Designations now influence funding, licensing, Marketplace visibility, specialisations, co-sell conversations and credibility with Microsoft sellers. Customers are asking for them in tenders and RFPs too. They touch sales, delivery, operations, skills planning and customer management.
So stop running your designation as an annual scramble. Decide which Microsoft capabilities genuinely matter to your business, understand the scoring mechanics, build customer association into your sales and delivery process, give someone proper ownership, check the numbers regularly and plan for renewal while things are going well.
Finding out you’ve got 41 points with three months to go is technically a Microsoft partner strategy. It’s just not a very good one.
Not sure where your designation actually stands?
Get in touch
If you’d like a clear view of your Partner Capability Score, your associations and what your designation should be unlocking for you, email us. We’ll go through your Partner Center position with you and tell you plainly what needs attention before renewal comes round.
info@oaka.studio




